ASAP
|
January 13, 2012

Court Rejects Defendant's Spoliation Claim and Grants Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gonzales [pdf], No. 10-CV-5268 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 28, 2011), U.S.

ASAP
|
January 13, 2012

Court Orders Native Production, but Requesting Party Must Pay Any Associated Hardware or Software Costs

In Applied Prof’l Training v. Mira Costa College [pdf], No. 10cv1372 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012), U.S.

ASAP
|
January 12, 2012

Supreme Court Strengthens Exception Barring Employment Discrimination Suits Against Religious Entities

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision has reinforced the protections afforded to religious organizations

ASAP
|
January 12, 2012

Accommodation for Healthcare Employees Objecting to Abortion-Related Procedures

Healthcare employees who object to providing patient care for women seeking an abortion have long presented

ASAP
|
January 12, 2012

Insurance Company Special Investigators are Exempt Under Federal and State Laws, Ohio District Court Rules

After a trial to the court in September 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District

ASAP
|
January 12, 2012

NLRB Ruling Puts Arbitration Agreements with Class Action Waivers in Question

In D.R. Horton, Inc., the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) last week ruled that arbitration

ASAP
|
January 11, 2012

Claims Review Procedures Must Be in Plan Document (Not Just SPD) Post-Amara, District Court Holds

In Kaufmann v.By Danielle K. Herring In Kaufmann v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, a New Hampshire

ASAP
|
January 11, 2012

NLRB Strikes Down Arbitral Class Action Waiver

In D.R. Horton, Inc., (pdf) the National Labor Relations Board, by a 2-0 vote, found that an arbitration

ASAP
|
January 11, 2012

The IRS Reduces Its Program for Requesting Tax Status Determination Letters

By Adam J. Peters On January 3, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Revenue Procedure 2012‑6,

ASAP
|
January 11, 2012

California Appellate Court Holds Insurance Agents Not Employees Under California Law

In Arnold v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, a California appellate court issued a published decision

Pages