Insight
|
March 28, 2008

DHS Circles the Wagons and Refuses to Budge on No-Match Rule

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a Supplemental Proposed Rule on March 21, 2008, and

Insight
|
March 27, 2008

US Supreme Court Allows EEOC Medicare Coordination Ruling to Stand

In a closely watched case, the United States Supreme Court has refused the AARP's request for review

Insight
|
March 25, 2008

DOL Checklist Offers Key to the Mysteries of Wellness Program Identification

Certain health promotion or disease prevention programs offered by a group health plan – commonly known

Insight
|
March 13, 2008

Indiana Joins the List of States Providing Legal Protections to Nursing Mothers at the Workplace

Returning to work is often cited as one of the main reasons that nursing mothers discontinue breastfeeding.

ASAP
|
March 7, 2008

Enjoining Damaging Web Posts by Former Employees Comes at a Steep Price

Our last blog entry discussed the First Amendment shield that covers current and former employees who

Insight
|
March 6, 2008

The California Supreme Court Narrowly Rules That Individuals Are Not Liable for Retaliation in Some Circumstances

In a 4-3 decision, the California Supreme Court in Jones v. The Lodge at Torry Pines Partnership, found

Insight
|
March 5, 2008

Supreme Court Holds "Me Too" Evidence May Be Admissible to Prove Discrimination

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its unanimous opinion in Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn,

Insight
|
March 5, 2008

A Charge, by Any Other Name, Is Still a Charge: High Court Adopts Broad Definition in Age Cases

The United States Supreme Court has adopted a very broad definition of what constitutes a "charge" for

Insight
|
March 4, 2008

DHS Jacking Up Fines for Employing Illegal Aliens

The cost of doing business just got higher. In a joint briefing with Secretary of Homeland Security Michael

Insight
|
March 4, 2008

Trade Secrets and Former Employees: Memorized Client Lists Can Still Be Protected as a Secret

The Supreme Court of Ohio has ruled that the use of a memorized client list by a former employee can

Pages