ASAP
|
April 2, 2010

EEOC Issues Advisory Letters on Use of Credit Checks, Education Requirements as Selection Criteria

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) Office of Legal Counsel recently made available

Insight
|
April 2, 2010

Missouri Remains a Paradise for Enforcement of Noncompetes

In Paradise v. Midwest Asphalt Coatings, Inc., No. WD70944 slip op. (Mo. App. W.D. Mar. 16, 2010) the

ASAP
|
April 2, 2010

Hundreds of New York Area Hospital Systems Hit by Wage and Hour Class Actions

The wage and hour class action epidemic spread last week to New York City metropolitan area hospitals

ASAP
|
April 2, 2010

Arizona House Advances Strict Immigration Enforcement Bill

The New York Times reports that Arizona legislators have given preliminary approval to legislation that

ASAP
|
April 2, 2010

Greek Nationals Eligible for U.S. Visa Waiver Program

The Department of Homeland Security has published a final rule in the Federal Register designating Greece

Insight
|
April 2, 2010

HIRE Act Signed Into Law — What it Means to Employers Update – IRS Weighs in. Do you have shovel ready jobs?

In its latest effort to stimulate the economy and encourage employment, Congress passed the Hiring Incentives

ASAP
|
April 2, 2010

Canada: Backlog of Skilled Immigrant Visa Applications Emerging

Canada is on the verge of a backlog of skilled immigrant applications, reports the Toronto Star. Recent

Insight
|
April 2, 2010

New Oregon Law Prohibits Credit Checks

On March 29, 2010, Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski signed into law Senate Bill 1045, making it an unlawful

Insight
|
April 1, 2010

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules that E-Mails Exchanged Between Employee and Her Attorney Using Company's Computer Remain Privileged

In a case with potentially nationwide implications, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in Stengart v. Loving

ASAP
|
April 1, 2010

Employers Should Act Promptly in Response to NJ High Court's Recognition of Employee's Right to Privacy in Lawyer-Client Emails Stored on Company Computers

In a case with significant implications for all employers, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled earlier

Pages