Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.
Computerworld reports that the United States government is reviewing whether the recently-enacted border security law, funded through increased H-1B and L-1 visa application fees for certain foreign-owned companies, runs afoul of World Trade Organization rules, as the law’s opponents and India’s Commerce Secretary contend. However, the issue was only briefly addressed in a recent U.S. Department of State press briefing during which a spokesperson confirmed that discussions about the law were being held between U.S. and Indian officials. Some suggest that the law could increase Indian companies’ U.S. operating costs by $250 million per year.
In a separate article, Computerworld reports that the law has caused rare consensus among H-1B visa advocates and opponents. Individuals on both sides contend that the bill will not create IT jobs for Americans. They suggest that targeted companies—foreign entities operating in the U.S. whose workforce is 50% or more foreign—can easily shift operations to Canada or Latin America. Finally, there are concerns that the fees’ generated revenue is misdirected, and that the funds should be used to spur innovation in the U.S. technology industry rather than to increase law enforcement operations at the United States’ southwestern border.