Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.
In an opinion that potentially expands an employer’s liability in discrimination cases, the Supreme Court has found that an employer can be found liable under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) for the discriminatory intent of company officials who influenced – but did not make – the ultimate adverse employment decision. In Staub v. Proctor Hospital, (pdf) the Court held that an employer is liable under USERRA “if a supervisor performs an act motivated by antimilitary animus that is intended by the supervisor to cause an adverse employment action,” and that act “is a proximate cause of the ultimate employment action.” Appellate courts have applied varying standards under this “cat’s paw” theory of imputed liability, which holds an employer accountable for the unlawful motives and actions of an official who dupes or influences an unbiased decision maker into acting unlawfully. Continue reading this entry at Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update.
Photo credit: Jeka Gorbunov