Your search returned 201 results.

Insight
|
June 2, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Retaliation Is a Form of Discrimination

IntroductionThe United States Supreme Court recently issued opinions in Gomez-Perez v. Potter, No. 06-1321

Insight
|
March 6, 2008

The California Supreme Court Narrowly Rules That Individuals Are Not Liable for Retaliation in Some Circumstances

In a 4-3 decision, the California Supreme Court in Jones v. The Lodge at Torry Pines Partnership, found

Insight
|
August 15, 2007

N.J. Supreme Court Extends New Jersey Law Against Discrimination Independent Contractor Test to the Whistleblower Statute

In a potentially far-reaching decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in D'Annunzio v. Prudential

Insight
|
April 3, 2007

N.J. Supreme Court Rules that a Retaliation Case Requires Underlying Complaint Be Made "Reasonably and in Good Faith"

In a case of first impression, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Carmona v. Resorts International Hotel,

Insight
|
August 24, 2006

The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005: Requiring Health Care Employers to Educate Employees in Whistleblowing

On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA). Included

Insight
|
June 23, 2006

Supreme Court Broadens Employee Protection Against Unlawful Retaliation

On June 22, 2006, the United States Supreme Court in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White,

Insight
|
December 8, 2005

Toward The End of the French Exception?: Overcoming the Challenges of Establishing a Global "Whistleblower" Hotline

The Challenge of Conflicting Laws Governing Hotlines in the United States and FrancePublicly-traded companies

Insight
|
April 11, 2005

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That a Private Right of Action for Retaliation Is Implied By Title IX

On March 29, 2005, a divided United States Supreme Court expanded the scope of Title IX by ruling that

Pages