InsideCounsel
In this article covering Jarek Molski's career as a repeat plaintiff triggering ADA cases in California, Littler's Garry Mathiason is quoted on possible outcomes benefiting the employer, if the 9th circuit determines Molski is a vexatious litigant. Mathiason notes, "One possible outcome is for the court to establish a test that when a lawsuit is brought because someone is testing that law and actually seeks the benefits of statute, special attention must be given to the credibility of the plaintiff. This means potentially allowing the plaintiff's past history of litigation to be put before the court."