Your search returned 269 results.

ASAP
|
March 1, 2011

California Supreme Court Holds Right to File Wage Claim with State Labor Commissioner Trumps Pre-Dispute Arbitration Provision

In the California Supreme Court opinion of Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno, a 4-3 majority of the court

Insight
|
October 26, 2010

ALJ Finds Hospitals Receiving More than $50,000 in TRICARE Reimbursement Subject to OFCCP Regulations

Department of Labor (DOL) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Tureck recently held in OFCCP v. Florida Hospital

ASAP
|
October 22, 2010

ALJ Finds Hospitals Receiving More Than $50,000 in TRICARE Reimbursement Subject to OFCCP Regulations

A Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge held in OFCCP v. Florida Hospital of Orlando, 2009-OFC-2

ASAP
|
May 3, 2010

Oregon Supreme Court Decides Employers Not Required to Accommodate an Employee's Use of Medical Marijuana

On April 14, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that Oregon’s disability discrimination law did not require

ASAP
|
March 9, 2010

What Does the Criminal Conviction for Privacy Law Violations of Three Google Executives in Italy Mean for Multi-National Employers in the U.S.?

On February 24, 2010, a Milan court convicted Google’s Chief Legal Officer, Global Privacy Counsel,

Insight
|
June 12, 2008

Georgia's Parking Lot Law Has Less Bang for Employers Than Predicted

Georgia is a state where many employees in both rural and urban areas own guns; many are licensed to

Insight
|
March 3, 2008

Federal Arbitration Act Trumps State Laws Lodging Primary Jurisdiction in State Administrative Forums

In Preston v. Ferrer, No. 06-1463 (Feb. 20, 2008) ("Preston"), the U.S. Supreme Court once again upheld

Insight
|
June 13, 2007

Supreme Court Gives a Helping Hand to Home Healthcare Agencies in Upholding the FLSA's Companionship Exemption to Third-Party Employers

On June 11, 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided Long Island Care at Home Ltd. v. Coke, U.S.,

Insight
|
July 20, 2006

California's Supreme Court Requires Employers Nationally to Re-Examine Telephone Monitoring Policies and Practice

In a unanimous decision with national implications, the California Supreme Court ruled July 13, 2006,

Pages